conduit

my "position" is that there is no one position.  i may seem to contradict myself, but that is by perception, perspective and perhaps a varying bit of my own failing in articulating through conventionally accessible communication forms.

we each will see what we each will see.  what we can see.  what we want to see.
the relevance of my points and notes to anyone else is as their will will commit to their reality.
it seems obvious that each of us are this way.  but it does not show up in the continuing result of human life.  at least not on the outward observable results.
there is alot of arguing that goes on, myself included.  humans fuss entirely too much, i feel.  we can operate so much more smoothly but that is not "in the cards," well, at least at the moment.

i have difficulty with unthinkers, but unthinkers are part of a current equation.  a percentage of the dynamic of humankind, of the earth as it is.  who is to say who should exist, what to think. who is important, why.
we each have those "rights."

by thought, we are.

what is important is what we find important.

what will be, or better put "is," does not hinge on our will or action.  "yes it does" - is the kind of response of thinking that cannot see beyond one's own sentence in the story, in the library.