Tuesday, July 19, 2011

el too y whot

argent glim is our natural lure. what is seen, what squeaks, what bothers, what yells, what fuss. that all is connected is lost to most. most need to see, need to touch, need to hear, need to know. sensing is believing. but by extension then nothing exists that is not sensible(able to be sensed, or in other words, currently sensed).

humans have senses, have evolved our states because of what can exist in the dynamic seemingly present; all of earth and observable universe, to varying degrees, of what is able to be observed, is this way. again, it goes to what we can sense. reality is all that we sense (including “have sensed”).

intellect affords us indulgence in the abstract; perhaps this is ultimately detriment, maybe benefit – only in far-futured retrospect could we know. it is our intellect and the abstract envelopes that allow us to out-evolve the pace of our biological statements. it is our culture: science, knowledge, values, etc. that have advanced us, our biology is slow to catch up to the pace of our cultural evolution.

but some things we(humans collectively) can cross-teach or culturally-disseminate so that the mean populous can at least appreciate or enjoy some amount of the awareness, perspective, insight.

ultimately i am saying that many people do not think. they are “unthinkers.” that is “un” and not “non.” for whatever reason people do not think. they do not challenge, ask questions, care, discover, are curious, etc. whether it is because questions and discovery create new work, chore, problem, etc. or because they are unaware or biological unresponsive of the dynamic of thought.

when it comes to reputation, how much of that influences a person? a lot, i would hope given that humans generally need to be instinctive and analogous. without the consistent body of a population, the species would not survive unless the environment or contexts support such radical biology.

but even though we are instinct-driven, though we are beasts, though we are biological, we have the ability to rise above the biological commitment by using the brain of our biology to utilize thought. we can cross-examine and compare, observe, detect, discover, search, experiment, etc. we do this to enhance the scope of our abstract results. by doing so we create a healthier “gut” or intuition or collected experience base. this healthy gut enhances our reality and our ability to wield and influence it.

sure, we are socially programmed and structured, culturally conditioned, associations aligned with conformity; some of it taught, learned, copied by observation (nurtured) some of it instinctual (nature), but who decides that that is good or bad? is there a good or bad? like said earlier, how can we really know except in the far future retrospect, say 50,000 to a few million years (if humans survive that long).

there are many discoveries that have enhanced our longevity, our lives, the lives of other creatures, etc. at many points things that have been traditional, associated acceptable, cultural standard, accepted practice, etc. have been changed or altered or fought against to be eliminated for better practices. if no one thought past the comfortable sentence we would not know the periods beyond.

but there are many people who have to fit themselves, contort themselves, force themselves, into established compartments and category. the pressure of the species body is immense. the more in the core one is the less movement is allowed. it is simple how one fits in the cell-sphere model of humanity. the more you need to move, the more you think, the further out you will find yourself or that you need to get to in order to find that comfortable rhythm. some of us find ourselves on the outskirts, the fringe, the exposed vulnerable spots on the outermost skin of the sphere. for us, that is where we find our rhythm within the human entire.

historical record (and by extension the popular-current) is fool of holes. true it is an indication, but not a complete one. it is missing massive volumes of those who have existed, things that have existed. some might say that those who make the historical record or obtain any (varying) degree of notoriety or acknowledgement is deserving, “should be” recognized, or is simply what is needed to make it to record, perhaps that “all else do not matter or are not worth of note.” but those associative assigns and constructs are limited thinking. they do not take into consideration the vastness of life and the connection all has. “all” not arrogantly-isolated to humans, but of all in existence living or not.

it is a matter of culture and biological response that we assign the importances. we want to be or our interests to be safe, to survive, to be comfortable, to thrive, and so we respond to those things that enable or return those kind of results.
i just wish there were more thinkers, perhaps all of humanity cannot be this way. there needs to be the consistent and stable body, the core, of humanity. the outward layers of the human sphere are the ones to take the chances, to search the darkness, to test the unknowns, and then to share the discoveries with the body. layer by layer we contribute to the sphere; not evenly, not surely to the entire, but the average and eventuality is what we all are.

we each support, promote, protect what our dynamic represents, it’s collection, it’s indication. we connect, we are connected always, but it is in the sharing and the consideration outside of yourself that enriches the connection that makes humanity both strong and resilient.

No comments:

Post a Comment